Unveiled: The Sinister "Cast a Deadly Spell on Your Infant" Appointment | Pediatricians Accused of Poisoning, Brainwashed, Acting out of Goodwill, yet Deadly Consequences
In this article, we delve into the role of pediatricians during the Well-Baby visit, a routine checkup that is crucial for an infant's health and development. However, this essential aspect of healthcare often goes overlooked, and some have even compared it to a modern-day child sacrifice ritual.
The Well-Baby visit typically involves routine checkups and immunizations, which are widely recommended by medical authorities. Yet, some parents express frustration and confusion over repeated medical testing and treatments, despite pediatricians reassuring them that their child is healthy. This frustration might fuel distrust against pediatricians in some groups.
The comparison of pediatricians to "poisoners" in the context of the Well-Baby visit controversy appears to stem from dissent or distrust related to routine pediatric practices, particularly around immunizations and medical advice during well-child visits. However, it's essential to clarify that there is no direct authoritative evidence in the provided search results explicitly labeling pediatricians as "poisoners" or supporting this claim as a mainstream controversy.
The controversy might also be conflated with criticisms of groups like the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds), a socially conservative group distinct from mainstream pediatric bodies, which has faced criticism for politicizing pediatric practices and misusing research. However, this is separate from the standard Well-Baby visits or claims of poisoning.
French author Etienne de la Boetie, in his article published on both dailynewsfromaolf.substack.com and unbekoming.substack.com, finds the language used by pediatricians about vaccines to be vile doublespeak. He questions whether the Well-Baby visit is a form of child sacrifice, a comparison that, like the label of "poisoners," lacks credible evidence or support by mainstream pediatric research or organizations.
The author also suggests that pediatricians are brainwashed, well-intentioned, and lethal, a perspective that invites further discussion and debate. If you have thoughts on this topic, we encourage you to submit comments on the article.
One voice that stands out in this discussion is Marcella Piper-Terry, who has been a beacon of truth and reason in the face of misinformation. Her work is greatly appreciated.
As this article is part of a series, we invite you to join the conversation and seek the truth together. Let's continue to explore the role of pediatricians and the Well-Baby visit in a thoughtful and informed manner.
- The comparison made by Etienne de la Boetie, along with his claims about pediatricians' language about vaccines, suggests a skepticism towards science-based health-and-wellness practices like immunizations, mental-health assessments, and fitness-and-exercise recommendations during Well-Baby visits.
- Despite the essential role pediatricians play in ensuring the health and development of infants during Well-Baby visits, some critics such as de la Boetie argue that their involvement might potentially entail questionable practices, such as brainwashing or even child sacrifice rituals, which remain unsubstantiated by mainstream pediatric research or organizations.
- The ongoing debate about the Well-Baby visit emphasizes the need for rigorous, evidence-based discussions and critiques of the role of pediatricians in shaping our understanding of children's health and wellness, including topics like articles, truth, science, fitness-and-exercise, mental-health, and health-and-wellness practices.
